Birth Injury Marketing
Market intelligence · free, sourced, gaps left empty

Malpractice climate

Every other page in this layer is finished. This one is not, and publishing it unfinished is the point. The dataset that belongs here — National Practitioner Data Bank malpractice payment reports by state and allegation group — is the single highest-value source for this market, and we do not have it.

Status: incomplete, and here is exactly why

The NPDB Public Use File is free and public. Acquiring it requires submitting a form carrying a named individual's name, title and email address, and accepting a data use agreement on their behalf. That is a small thing, and it is still someone's identity being given to a federal system by an automated process. It was not done without asking.

Once acquired, this page will carry: paid malpractice reports by state and by year since 1990; the obstetrics-related allegation groups isolated; payment range distributions by state; and the change over time. It will carry a matching set of limits, because payment reports are not claim counts and neither is a measure of merit.

Malpractice payment reports in this layer
None yetNPDB acquisition pending
Damage cap and certificate-of-merit rules published
None yetper-state statutory research in progress; only verified states will publish
Figures estimated to fill the gap
0and there will be none
Other intelligence pages complete
4 of 5births, delivery capacity, outcomes, legal market

What will go here, and the limits it will ship with

Planned content, and the caveat each element will carry. Published in advance so the caveats cannot quietly disappear when the data arrives.
ElementSourceThe limit it will be published with
Paid malpractice reports by state, by yearNPDB Public Use FileA payment report is not a claim. Claims that resolve without payment are not in the file, so this measures paid outcomes, not litigation volume.
Obstetrics-related allegation groups isolatedNPDB allegation group fieldAllegation grouping is as reported. It is not a clinical classification and not a finding of fault.
Payment range distributions by stateNPDB payment range fieldRanges, not amounts. No figure here will ever be presented as what any matter is worth.
Damage caps, certificate-of-merit and expert rulesState statutes, cited individuallyOnly states we have verified statute by statute will publish. Partial coverage will be shown as partial, not filled in.
Limitation periods, including for a minor’s claimState statutes, cited individuallyRules vary and carry exceptions. We will link the statute and never paraphrase it as advice.

A rule that will not relax when this page fills up

Nothing on this page will ever be joined to clinical outcome data. Malpractice payments describe a legal process. Adverse-event rates describe medicine. Correlating them would produce something that looks like insight and is not, and a medical malpractice audience would catch it immediately — correctly.

What is blocking this page. A single acquisition step gates the dataset; the page ships incomplete rather than filled with a substitute. NPDB Public Use File free, public, quarterly Requires a named request name, title, email, data use agreement Option taken: wait and say so page ships incomplete, publicly Option rejected: substitute a proxy state population, filings counts, anything else An incomplete page is worth more than a complete-looking wrong one
Figure 1 — one form stands between this page and the best dataset in the category. It will be submitted deliberately, by a person, and the page will be finished. Until then it says what it is missing. Full acquisition log.
What is available on malpractice climate today, and at what cost. Published so the gap on this page is checkable rather than asserted.
SourceWhat it givesAccessStatus here
NPDB Public Use FilePaid malpractice reports since 1990 by state, profession and allegation group, quarterlyFree, behind a named request form and a data use agreementNot acquired — awaiting the operator’s consent to submit a named request
NPDB Data Analysis ToolAggregate views of the same dataFree, browser-based, embedded analyticsNot machine-readable; unsuitable as a data source
State court administrative statisticsCivil filing and disposition counts, sometimes by case typeVaries by state; many publish annual reportsNot comparable across states; definitions differ substantially
State insurance department filingsMedical liability premium and loss dataVaries; some states publish, most do notPartial coverage only; not usable nationally
State statutesDamage caps, certificate of merit, expert rules, limitation periods including for minorsFree, primary, but requires verification state by stateIn progress. Only states verified statute by statute will publish.
Standing rules for this page when it does fill up. Written now so they cannot be quietly relaxed later.
RuleReason
No figure will be presented as what a matter is worthLaw 3 on this site, and a bar-advertising exposure for any firm that repeated it
Payment reports will never be described as claimsMatters resolving without payment are absent from the file entirely
No state will publish until its statutes are verified individuallyA partially verified national table is worse than an incomplete one, because it looks complete
Nothing will be joined to clinical outcome dataDifferent quantities, different collectors, different purposes
The acquisition date and vintage will appear on every figureThe file updates quarterly; a figure without a vintage is unfalsifiable

In the meantime, the four complete pages are births, delivery capacity, outcome measures and legal market capacity.

A limit we will not cross. Nothing on this page links a clinical outcome rate to a legal claim. Adverse-event rates measure medicine. Litigation measures a legal process. They are different quantities, they are collected by different agencies for different reasons, and correlating them would be the fastest way to publish something false. Where we present clinical data and legal data together, it is to describe a market — never to imply that one causes, predicts, or justifies the other.

Sources

  1. National Practitioner Data Bank — Public Use File — malpractice payment reports; acquisition pending, see Methodology
  2. CMS Care Compare — Maternal Health · Hospital — PC-02, PC-07a, PC-07b, SM-7; 2024 reporting period
  3. U.S. Census Bureau — County Population Totals and Components of Change, Vintage 2024 — births by county, 2021–2024

Cite this analysis

Free to reproduce with attribution, including commercially. Charts may be embedded as published.

Birth Injury Marketing. “Malpractice climate.” 24 August 2026. https://birthinjurymarketing.com/intelligence/malpractice-climate/

Journalists and researchers: we will cut this data to your specification — by state, by county, by hospital, by year — and send the underlying CSV, free and without conditions. Ask for a custom cut. We will also tell you what the data cannot support.

Elsewhere in the intelligence layer

How this was built, and what we could not get → · Model your own market → · All states →

Authorship & review

Author
Kevin Schwaner, Founder; Chief Marketing Officer. Credentials.
Last reviewed
Corrections
Found an error? Tell us and it goes in the dated corrections log, whether or not it flatters us.