Birth Injury Marketing
Free tool · no email, ever

Keyword cost reality

The only defensible bid ceiling is the one you derive backwards from a signed case. Put in what a viable matter is expected to be worth to your firm, your own conversion rates, and your screening cost, and this returns the maximum you can rationally pay per click — before any margin.

Derive your bid ceiling
Case economics
Your own figure, from your own resolved matters. We publish none.
What you are willing to spend to acquire one
12
Click to signed case
Clicks that become an inquiry
6
70
35
60
12
65
Screening cost and market price
Records plus review, blended
From your own account

The link carries your inputs. Forward it and the recipient sees exactly this result.

Result

maximum rational cost per click, at your target margin
Break-even cost per click
Your current cost per click
Headroom against the ceiling
Clicks per signed case
Media cost per signed case at your current price
Screening cost per signed case
All-in cost per signed case
All-in as a share of expected fee
Show the arithmetic

Why a very expensive click can be rational

Clicks consumed per signed case. Six sequential conversion steps, each multiplying the number of clicks required for one signed case. Click the unit you pay for 1 Inquiry landing page conversion × lp Contacted and screened speed and intake quality × contact × screen Records reviewed process discipline × records Viable the category’s own rate — not a marketing variable × viable Signed competitive close × sign Multiply the six rates and invert: that is how many clicks one signed case costs you.
Figure 1 — six multiplications, and the fifth is not a marketing variable. Viability is a property of the matters, not of the campaign. That is precisely why cost per lead misleads here: a campaign can improve five of these six and still deliver fewer cases if it degrades the mix feeding the fifth.
Which of the six rates you can actually move, and with what.
RateMovable?Lever
Landing page conversionYes, substantiallyConversion layer — form length, load speed, stating what happens next
Contact rateYes, substantiallySpeed-to-lead — the 90th percentile, not the median
Screen pass rateYes, through targetingBetter inquiry mix raises it; cheaper inquiry mix lowers it
Records obtainedYes, through processThe most recoverable loss in the whole funnel and almost never worked on
Viability rateNoA property of the matters. Targeting changes the mix; it does not change the medicine.
Signature ratePartlySpeed, credibility, and whether the firm can answer the family’s questions on the first call
Reading the headroom figure.
If headroom is…What it meansWhat to do
Comfortably positiveThe market price clears your economics. Buy more of it.Scale until review capacity binds
Slightly positiveYou are buying at close to break-even. Any conversion slippage puts you underwater.Fix conversion before adding budget
NegativeAt your current rates this channel loses money per case at this price.Improve the movable rates, or move budget to organic and referral

Provenance

Where every number in this tool comes from. Two categories only: measured from a cited federal dataset, or supplied by you. There is no third, and there is no industry average anywhere in it.
Input or outputOriginIf it is wrong, what breaks
Expected fee per signed viable matterYou — from your own resolved mattersThe ceiling, proportionally. It is the largest single lever.
The six conversion ratesYou — from your CRMClicks per signed case, which the ceiling divides by.
Screening cost per inquiryYou — invoices and reviewer timeThe ceiling. Omitting it is why bid ceilings are usually set too high.
Your current cost per clickYou — from your own ad accountThe headroom comparison only.
Any market cost-per-click figureNot present. Published figures for this category are unreliable across markets.n/a

No default in this tool is a claim. The starting values exist so the page is not blank on arrival. They are not benchmarks, they are not averages, and they describe no real firm. Replace every one of them with your own before acting on the result. See Methodology.