Birth Injury Marketing
Service line · Growth and up

Paid social

Search captures people already looking. In birth injury a large share of the addressable population is not looking, because they do not know that a claim relating to a birth years ago may still be live. Paid social is the only channel that reaches them at scale — and the only channel where doing it carelessly is genuinely harmful.

The line we do not cross

There is a version of this channel that works and is indefensible: distressing imagery, implied case values, countdown urgency, and creative engineered to make a parent believe something went wrong. We do not build it, and we will end an engagement over it. What we build instead is informational: what the limitations period for a minor’s claim generally means, what a records review involves, what questions a parent might ask their own lawyer. It converts more slowly and it holds up in front of a bar committee.

Creative review gate for sensitive categories. Every asset passes four checks before it can serve; failing any one returns it to the brief. any failall pass Brief Creative built Does it state or imply a value? Does it advise, or does it inform? Bar disclosures present for every state? Would we show it to the family in it? Rejected Firm review Serves
Figure 1 — four gates, and the fourth is the one that matters. The first three are compliance. The fourth is the test that keeps this channel defensible: if we would not be comfortable showing the advertisement to the family whose situation it depicts, it does not run, regardless of performance.

Who this channel actually reaches

Three audiences, three different jobs. Treating them as one is the most common error in the channel.
AudienceWhat they knowWhat the creative doesExpected screen-out rate
Recent delivery, concerns unresolvedSomething happened; no idea whether it is actionableExplains what a records review is and routes to counselHigh
Parent of an older child with a diagnosisA diagnosis; usually assumes it is far too lateExplains, generally, that limitation periods for a minor’s claim often run differently — never tells them they have a claimVery high, but the survivors are the most valuable inquiries in the category
Referring professionals and adjacent counselSees these families in practice; has no obvious routeIntroduces the firm’s co-counsel postureLow, and it feeds referral development
Attribution rules for a long consideration cycle. Published so you can hold us to them.
RuleReason
Signed cases are attributed on a lagged window matched to the firm’s own inquiry-to-signature intervalA 7-day window in a category where signature takes months will always make social look worthless
Assisted conversions are reported as a separate line and never added to last-click totalsAdding them double-counts, and a numerate partner will catch it
Screen-out rate is reported by audience, not blendedA blended rate hides which audience is producing the non-viable volume

The creative standard, in full →

What we report

What we report, and what we refuse to report as a headline. Vanity metrics still appear — they are diagnostic — but never at the top.
MetricRoleReported as
Cost per signed, viable casePrimaryHeadline, on a lagged attribution window appropriate to a long consideration cycle.
Cost per screened inquiryPrimarySocial inquiries screen out at a higher rate than search. Reported honestly.
Assisted signed casesDiagnosticSocial often opens; search closes. Reported as a separate line, never merged into last-click.
Frequency and negative feedback rateGuardrailA rising negative-feedback rate in this category is an ethics signal before it is a performance signal.
Cost per thousand, click-through rateOperationalAppendix only.
How an engagement is structured. Same shape on every service line, so you can compare bands directly.
PhaseLengthWhat happensWhat you get
0 · Diagnostic3 weeksMarket sizing from our data, audit of current spend against cost per signed case, screening-capacity modelA written plan and a decision. Credited in full against the first three months of any retainer.
1 · InstrumentationWeeks 1–4Tracking rebuilt so every inquiry carries its source through to the case management systemA funnel you can audit. Nothing is optimised before it can be measured.
2 · BuildWeeks 3–10Channel build, creative, landing pages, intake scripts and screening rubricAssets you own outright, in your accounts, under your name.
3 · OperateOngoingWeekly optimisation against cost per signed case, monthly against cost per case surviving reviewA monthly report that leads with signed cases, not impressions.

When this is the wrong service for you

If your firm is not prepared to have inquiries from people whose situations are heartbreaking and legally non-viable, do not buy this channel. It reaches people who are not searching, and a meaningful share of what it surfaces cannot be helped. That has an intake cost and a human cost, and both are real. Firms without screening capacity should not run it.

Related

What this costs → · Book a call → · Read the free library first →

Authorship & review

Author
Kevin Schwaner, Founder; Chief Marketing Officer. Credentials.
Last reviewed
Legal review
Not yet assigned. This page describes marketing practice, not law, and gives no legal advice. Rules cited are linked to the primary source so you can read them directly. See Editorial Standards.
Corrections
Found an error? Tell us and it goes in the dated corrections log, whether or not it flatters us.