Birth Injury Marketing
Free tool · no email, ever

Firm site audit

Twenty checks, weighted by how much each one actually moves signed cases in this practice area. Answer them honestly about your own site and you get a score, a priority order, and the reasoning behind every weight. The complete result appears here. Nothing is gated and nothing is sent anywhere.

Answer honestly. Scored live, on this page, and never sent anywhere.
Speed
Conversion
Measurement
Authority
Findability
Access
Compliance

The link carries your inputs. Forward it and the recipient sees exactly this result.

Score

out of 126
Speed
Conversion
Measurement
Authority
Findability
Access
Compliance

Why each check is weighted the way it is

The weighting, published in full. A scoring tool that hides its weights is an opinion pretending to be a measurement.
CheckAreaWeightReasoning
Renders in about a second on a mid-range phone on a poor connectionSpeed12Field data from your own analytics, not a lab score. This audience arrives on mobile, often at night, often on a weak connection.
Every page is usable at 375 pixels wide with no horizontal scrollSpeed8Check it on an actual phone. Tables and long headlines are the usual failures.
The main enquiry form asks four fields or fewerConversion8Every additional field costs completions. Name, contact, state, and a short description carry almost all the screening signal.
The page states explicitly what happens next, with a timeframeConversion6"We will call you within one business hour" converts better than "Submit".
First contact happens inside five minutes in business hoursConversion12The single highest-leverage operational variable in legal intake. Measure the 90th percentile, not the median.
After-hours inquiries reach a human by the next morningConversion6A meaningful share of inquiries in this category arrive outside business hours.
Every inquiry arrives tagged with its source, campaign and landing pageMeasurement8Without this, cost per signed case cannot be computed at all.
Inquiries can be joined to signed matters in the case management systemMeasurement8The join is the whole game. Most firms discover it does not exist when they first try to make it.
Call tracking is in place and calls are recorded where lawfulMeasurement4In this category a large share of inquiries are calls, and untracked calls are invisible spend.
Every substantive page carries a named author with credentialsAuthority6In health-and-legal topics, an unattributed page is the weakest asset you can own.
Clinical content carries a named clinical reviewer and a review dateAuthority6The hardest thing for a competitor to replicate, and the thing quality guidance rewards most.
Last-updated dates are real, not automatically bumpedAuthority3An automatically refreshed date on unchanged content is a trust liability, not an SEO tactic.
Statistics link to primary sources — statute, dataset, peer-reviewed studyAuthority5Never cite another marketing agency’s blog. It is the fastest way to inherit someone else’s error.
Structured data is present and accurate — and not stuffedFindability4
Pages open with a direct definitional answer before any framingFindability5This is what makes a passage extractable by an answer engine.
Tabular data uses real table markup with headersFindability3
An llms.txt exists and states what the site does and does not claimFindability2
Keyboard navigable, visible focus states, real alt text, WCAG 2.2 AAAccess6A site about injury that excludes disabled users is self-refuting, and in some contexts it is also a legal exposure.
Bar-required disclosures are present for every state you advertise intoCompliance6Requirements are state-specific and they bind the firm, not the vendor.
Nothing on the site states or implies what a matter might be worthCompliance8Case-value calculators aimed at families are the most common serious error in this category.
Where the weight sits. Total available points by area, showing that speed, conversion and measurement carry more than half the score. Conversion 32 pts Measurement 20 pts Speed 20 pts Compliance 14 pts Authority 20 pts Findability 14 pts Access 6 pts
Figure 1 — over half the available points sit in conversion, measurement and speed. That is deliberate. Design and content quality matter, but in this practice area a firm loses more cases to a four-hour callback and an untraceable inquiry than to anything on the page.
Reading your score.
ScoreWhat it usually meansWhere to start
Under 60Instrumentation is missing rather than broken. You cannot yet tell what works.Measurement and conversion layer
60–89The basics are there; speed and screening are usually the gap.Speed-to-lead
90–109A sound site. Remaining points are in authority and findability.SEO and AI search
110+Better than most firms in this category. Your constraint is probably not the website.Screening capacity

Provenance

Where every number in this tool comes from. Two categories only: measured from a cited federal dataset, or supplied by you. There is no third, and there is no industry average anywhere in it.
Input or outputOriginIf it is wrong, what breaks
The twenty checksUs — a published rubric with published weightsNothing is hidden; every weight and its reasoning is in the table above.
Your answersYou — about your own siteThe score. Answering optimistically produces an optimistic score and no other benefit.
Speed and mobile itemsYou — from field data in your own analyticsThe two heaviest categories. A lab score will flatter you here.
Compliance itemsYou — verified against your own bar requirementsThese are the items with real exposure attached. Have compliance counsel confirm rather than guessing.
The scoreComputed — sum of the weights passedNothing; the arithmetic is addition.

No default in this tool is a claim. The starting values exist so the page is not blank on arrival. They are not benchmarks, they are not averages, and they describe no real firm. Replace every one of them with your own before acting on the result. See Methodology.